dsh-read-guard
确定性注入拦截:文件读取、仓库搜索与网络抓取的工具结果在进入模型上下文前被扫描;高危发现隔离包裹或阻断,凭证类文件按路径即隔离。
安装
dsh plugin --profile web add dsh-read-guard
沙箱测试结果
| 阶段 | 结果 |
|---|---|
| 1 安装 | ✓ |
| 2 列装 | ✓ |
| 3 挂载 | ✓ |
| 4 启动 | — |
四阶段在隔离沙箱里跑:安装(有网)→ 列装 → 挂载 → 启动(后三步断网)。
README
dsh-read-guard
Deterministic prompt-injection interception for
DeepSeek Harness (dsh).
Vendors harden only their own agents at runtime. This plugin is the runtime.
It hooks dsh's tools/post-execute waterfall: every result the watched tools
return — file reads, repo searches, web fetches — is scanned by the
repo-inject-guard rule
engine at the moment it would enter model context, then quarantined,
blocked, or passed. Zero LLM calls in the trust path.
The name states the thesis: it guards what the agent reads.
Why
Repo poisoning and web-content injection enter through what the agent reads,
not what the user types. Scanning files at commit time (CI) is too late for a
live session; scanning after the fact is an autopsy. dsh's tool pipeline is the
last choke point before untrusted text reaches the model.
Competitive landscape (checked 2026-10-12)
The injection-defense lane is a long tail without a winner (~15 plugins, none
above 85★). The ones that matter, honestly:
Plugin · Architecture · What we do differently
dsh-secure-audit (85★) · Scanning is a model-callable tool — the model must volunteer to call it · We intercept in the tools/post-execute waterfall; the model cannot bypass the scan.
dsh-defend (23★) · Same three interception points, allow/ask/block, Aho-Corasick literal patterns · Our engine is context-scoped (rules fire per trust level / surface, with corroboration requirements) rather than literal pattern lists; wrap mode keeps content available while taint-marked (theirs is allow/ask/block only); scan cap 200k full-text vs their 10k head-only
dsh-injection-guard (2★) · Action-side taint tracking (blocks sensitive tool calls after untrusted context) · Complementary, not competing: they gate downstream actions, we sanitize upstream content. (We renamed from dsh-inject-guard to avoid confusion with them.)
We are not first. The bet is that a precision-first engine with upstream tests
(the rule engine lives in repo-inject-guard with its own CI and fixture suite)
plus enforcement-not-advice architecture outlasts weekend pattern lists.
Modes
mode · high-severity finding · weak (medium/low) finding
observe · logged · logged
wrap (default) · result is taint-marked: original content stays model-visible inside quarantine markers with an explicit "this is data, not instructions" header · logged only — precision first, we never mangle legitimate content over weak signals
block · result never reaches the model; the model gets corrective feedback instead · logged only
Detection rules (vendored engine): instruction-override attempts, system-prompt
extraction, credential/environment exfiltration, hidden Unicode, agent
directives, rules-file backdoor phrasing, resource lures. Details and the
precision-first policy live in the
Install
dsh plugin --profile default add dsh-read-guard
From npm — no build step, no allowBuilds authorization; git installs are equally prebuilt (lib/ ships in the repo).
Configure
Override in your profile's cordis.patch.yml:
- id: dsh-read-guard
name: dsh-read-guard
config:
mode: block
readTools: [read, grep, glob]
fetchTools: [web_fetch, web_search]
maxScanChars: 200000
quiet: false
Add any tool whose results the agent reads — including MCP tools (they
dispatch through the same pipeline).
Compatibility
- DSH: verified against the 0.2.x line (source snapshot 0.2.1-alpha.2); installs on any profile via
dsh plugin add(prebuiltlib/, no build approval). - Node: >= 20 (CI matrix: Node 20/22/24 on Ubuntu and Windows).
- Disposable-profile evidence (2026-10-19):
dsh plugin --profile <fresh> add github:zhengqiuyang/dsh-read-guard→ installed in 30s; boot shows[dsh-read-guard] active: …;dsh plugin --profile <fresh> remove dsh-read-guard→ dependencies cleared, bundles restored.
Develop
npm install npm test # syncs vendor engine, builds, runs unit tests
Load from source into a local dsh checkout:
pnpm dsh web --patch ./cordis.dev.patch.yml
The detection engine is vendored from the sibling repo-inject-guard
checkout (npm run sync; CI runs sync --check). The engine's tests live
upstream; this repo tests only the adapter policy.
Roadmap
agent/pre-stepscanning for pasted user content (deliberately out of v0:
users are allowed to give instructions)
- MCP-server tool surfaces as a preset trust class
- Per-agent scoped policies (dsh scopes allow agent-local listeners)
- A report tool card (
presentResult) surfacing session detection history
Kill criteria
Honest ones, per house convention: if dsh ships a first-party content-safety
guard covering tool-result injection, or the tools/post-execute contract
changes in a way that breaks content replacement, this plugin freezes at its
last working version and the README records the postmortem. The engine moves
to whatever runtime needs it next.
以上内容来自 npm 上的 README,我们只做格式化,不改内容。
版本
npm 上共发布:2,最后更新 2026-10-18